Newsletter - December
2008
Website:
www.sednet.org
Compiled by: Marjan Euser (marjan.euser@tno.nl)
Subscription Service: SedNet Secretariat (marjan.euser@tno.nl)
Disclaimer: SedNet is not responsible for faults due to
incorrectness of info in this newsletter
Previous issues:
www.sednet.org
CONTENTS
Next SedNet event
Sediment Management in River Basin Management Plans (Round
Table Discussion) and
The Role of Sediments in Coastal Management (Conference)
on 6-8 October 2009, Hamburg, Germany
The issue of Sediment Management is rising on the
European agenda. Sediment topics will be an element of
several River Basin Management Plans which are to be
published in 2009 under the Water Framework Directive.
Sediment Mangement is an element of a new Working Group
on Estuaries, managed by the Nature and Bio-diversity
unit of DG Environment of the EU Commission. Sediments
are named in new EU legislation, like the Directive on
environmental quality standards in the field of water
policy, the Marine Strategy Directive, and the Waste
Directive.
In Europe the largest amounts of sediments have to be
dredged in the North Sea region, where the natural
sediment regime in the sea leads to high sedimentation
in ports, harbours and waterways. At the same time, due
to expected sea level rise and loss of fine grained
sediments in the Wadden Sea, sediments gain importance
in other respects.
On this background SedNet intends to organise another
event, this time in Hamburg, Germany, where still
ongoing river restoration challenges coincide with
dredging needs. Here sediments play a central role. Thus
the region is a good example to discuss cross-cutting
science-policy issues.
It is intended to follow the outline of SedNet event
which took place in November 2006 in Venice with a Round
Table Discussion with invited speakers and an open
conference with a special focus.
The date will be Tuesday-Thursday 6-8 October 2009.
The venue will be the Patriotische Gesellschaft, a very
nice old building with conference facilities in the very
center of Hamburg. The conference will take place on 6-8
October 2009. Further details will be disseminated in
due time.
top
Transatlantic inspiration as promising start for
potential cooperation
River basin management challenges and uncertainties
appear the same in the USA/Canada and Europe. The common
management issues are: hydro-morphological alterations
and diffuse pollution (nutrients from agriculture),
followed by specific – historic legacy related – issues
in specific basins. However, compared to Europe,
USA/Canada developed different approaches to overcome
these challenges. Furthermore, like in Europe, USA and
Canada put a lot of effort in research and in policy
development aimed to find new ways to improve/optimize
the effectiveness of river basin management: technical
as well as improvements in participatory approaches.
This all seems to provide an excellent basis for
transatlantic inspiration and learning, and maybe also
for transatlantic cooperation aimed to jointly address
these common challenges.
This was the key-conclusion from a study trip of Adriaan
Slob (TNO) and Jos Brils (Deltares/TNO) to the USA and
Canada end of October/beginning November 2008. Main
objective of the study trip was to learn more about the
holistic, integrative strategies applied in the USA and
Canada to overcome the many and complex challenges faced
in river basin management. Adriaan and Jos visited
subsequently: Lafayette (Lower Mississippi Delta/Atchafalaya
basin), San Francisco (San Francisco Bay redevelopment),
Edmonton/Canada (river basin management in general in
Alberta) and finally Washington (US EPA and World
Resources Institute). They spoke with representatives of
many institutions from science/research to NGO to SME to
research funders. Their findings were reported to EC DG
Research as well as to officials within US EPA.
Furthermore, they proposed to organize a joint (North
America - Europe) conference (2009 or 2010?) e.g. on the
theme "new approaches to face common challenges in water
management". That conference could thus be the starting
basis for further cooperation on priority topics jointly
identified and agreed upon. The EC and EPA were asked if
such a "North America - Europe" conference would fit
under the EC-EPA cooperation agreement (see:
http://ec.europa.eu/research/press/2007/pr0902-2en.cfm)
and if there thus would exist any opportunity to apply
for some necessary sponsoring to make it happen.
Contact: Jos Brils ( jos.brils@tno.nl) and/or Adriaan Slob (adriaan.slob@tno.nl)
top
Paradigm shift in river basin management
River basin management is extremely challenging, amongst
others due to the complex and not well understood
interactions between the biophysical (ecological) and
social system. Furthermore, management is further
complicated due to uncertainties related to the
anticipated impacts of global change. That is why the EC
FP6 Integrated Project NeWater (see:
www.newater.info)
at their final conference in Seville (17-19 November
2008) advocated and gave guidance on how to achieve a
‘paradigm shift’ in water management. The core is to
shift from traditional ‘command and control’ management
practices (paradigm example: “protect against water”)
towards ‘Adaptive Water Management’ (paradigm examples:
“room for the river” or “living with water”).
Independent and apart from NeWater the EC FP6 project
RISKBASE (www.riskbase.info) as well as the Dutch
“Living with Water” project “AquaTerra-Nederland” (www.levenmetwater.nl)
also came to this ‘paradigm shift’ and described it in
their own words as follows:
|
• |
regard river basins (and parts thereof) as complex,
dynamic and close-knit social/ ecological systems; |
|
• |
select the sustaining of ecosystem services (see:
www.millenniumassessment.org) as the central objective; |
|
• |
apply – risk-based – the best available system
understanding (scientific and local) to reach the above
objective; |
|
• |
hereby accept, and thus learn, to live with uncertainty
and surprises; |
|
• |
manage local/regionally, include all stakeholders but
also have concern for our neighbours down- and upstream; |
|
• |
regard the WFD – or any other current environmental
policies – as tools, no longer as objective; |
|
• |
learn by doing, in small steps, and correct
instantaneously if needed (adaptive). |
Although easily agreed upon, it is also realized that we
are still ‘miles away’ from this paradigm shift. The
next generation of WFD river-basin management plans will
provide some room for improvements. That is for sure.
But how much? This is exactly what we have to find out
in the last phase of the above mentioned RISKBASE and
Living with Water project: we have to define what the
next small step can realistically be, keeping this
paradigm shift in mind.
Contact: Jos Brils (jos.brils@tno.nl), coordinator RISKBASE and
AquaTerra-Nederland
top
Adoption of the Directive on environmental quality
standards in water
Article 16 of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC
sets out a strategy for dealing with chemical pollution
of water. As a first step towards implementation of this
strategy, a list of priority substances was adopted by
the European Commission, identifying substances of
priority concern at Community level (Decision 2455/2001/EC).
A new Directive proposal, aiming to ensure a high level
of protection against the risks from these priority
substances and certain other pollutants to the aquatic
environment, was launched by the Commission in July
2006.
The core of this daughter Directive is the setting of
environmental quality standards for different important
pollutants. More specifically, the “Directive on
environmental quality standards in the field of water
policy and amending Directive 2000/60” sets limits on
concentrations in surface waters of 41 types of
pesticides, heavy metals and other dangerous chemical
substances. Apart from the setting of these
environmental quality standards, it provides rules with
regard to the cessation of emissions, discharges and
losses, the establishment of inventories and the
determination of transitional areas of exceedance. A
transitional area of exceedance can be defined for the
vicinity of point source discharges for those parts of
water bodies where the environmental quality standards
cannot be met due to the elevated levels of pollutants
in the effluents.
After publication in July 2006, the Directive proposal
followed its legislative way through European Parliament
and Council. After a first political agreement reached
within the Council in June 2007 and a vote at second
reading within the Parliament in June 2008, the EU
environment ministers finally rubber-stamped
second-reading agreements in October 2008. The adoption
of this daughter Directive completes the pieces of
legislation needed to support the Water Framework
Directive. It can therefore be regarded as the last
remaining legislative component of the EU’s water
strategy. The new Directive will enter into force
following publication in the EU’s official journal.
Member States must transpose the Directive within 18
months.
top
Chemical Monitoring Activity (CMA) - Guideline for
Monitoring Sediment and Biota under the Water Framework
Directive
Keeping in mind that about 80% of the Priority
Substances of the WFD are sorbed to sediment and
suspended particulate matter (SPM) the Parliament,
Council and Commission of the EU agreed in June 2008 to
give the Member States the opportunity to apply
environmental quality standards (EQS) for sediment and/or
biota instead of those for water.
The guideline which is scheduled for 2009 will bring up
the monitoring requirements for controlling the EQS and
will cover freshwater, transition zone and coastal and
marine zone aquatic ecosystems.
Surface sediments (the upper 5-10 cm in most cases) will
be collected in net deposition zones with preferentially
no change in geochronology. SPM sampling will be
included as an alternative. In co-operation with the
River Basin Management Plans (IKSR, IKSE, IKSD...) 4-5
representative sampling locations are recommended where
composite samples are taken. The frequency will be
according to the WFD every 1 to 3 years and up to 6
years for lakes and coastal areas. Recommendations for
the sampling equipment, the normalisation, preparation
and storage will be given in detail.
Additionally, requirements and aspects of the trend
monitoring will be included. It is recommended to
analyse the contamination geochronology once to get
information related to the re-exposure of older
contaminated sediments during flood events and dredging
activities in accordance with the data available and the
River Basin Management Plans.
top
Water Information System for Europe
An interesting website for everybody who is looking for
information on policies, projects, tools, documents or
any other information that is relevant for the
implementation of the Water Framework Directive:
http://www.wise-rtd.info.
top
Stability of Contaminated Sediments
The Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI) has completed
a five-year Strategic Research Programme on “Stability
of Contaminated Sediments” supported by The Research
Council of Norway (RCN).
The research program focused on advancing the state of
knowledge on physical and chemical sediment stability,
the understanding and prediction of contaminant
transport, and the design of long term containment
methods.
Historically, sediments have been a sink for the
contaminant input, from rivers, urban and industrial
activity as well as atmospheric input to the fjords.
Significant reduction in industrial point sources has
been achieved over the last decades. Detailed site
investigation can answer the question whether the
sediments at present are still forming a sink or have
become a secondary source of contaminants to the fjord
system. Diffuse sources related to our daily life, like
run-off from traffic and urbanised areas, have been
shown to be significant for the near coastal zone. This
contaminant input sets clear limits to the environmental
objectives that can be achieved by sediment remediation
alone.
Significant environmental improvement of fjords and the
coastal zone can only be achieved if a set of remedial
measures is implemented that covers all relevant sources
both on shore and off-shore. This clearly indicates that
sediment contamination is not an echo from the past but
a mirror of our behaviour.
The main focus of the research was on the integration of
knowledge on the physical and chemical interactions in
contaminated sediments, with the following objectives:
| 1. |
Quantify the principal parameters determining the
physical and chemical stability of contaminants in the
sediment matrix. |
| 2. |
Determine the contaminant migration resulting from
engineering operations in contaminated sediments, like
dredging, backfilling and construction works. |
| 3. |
Establish design criteria for containment methods with a
long-term intrinsic stability and required safety. |
| 4. |
Develop tools to evaluate efficiency of remediation
methods. |
| 5. |
Develop innovative methods for sediment remediation,
e.g. through thin-layer capping or sorbent amendment. |
The final report summarizes the main results of the
research program. A bibliography of the published papers
is given in the last section for further reference.
A summary report is available free of charge. You can
order a copy via ngi@ngi.no.
It will also be possible to download the report from
www.ngi.no.
top
SEDAG – the Sediment Advisory Group of SETAC
Recently SEDAG has initiated working groups. The working
groups will exist for a limited time and for a specific
objective. WG info and developments will be made
available on the internet. WG’s are open to everybody
and in particular to members of SedNet.
The following WG-descriptions have been made available:
|
• |
Watershed level assessment of contaminant fate and
transport in sediments to build conceptual site models (WG-chair:
AmyMarie Accardi-Dey,
aaccardi-dey@pirnie.com)
|
|
• |
Behaviour, fate and bioavailability of particle bound
contaminants in changing aquatic environments (WG-chair:
Susanne Heise,
susanne.heise@haw-hamburg.de)
|
|
• |
Ecosystem based sustainable sediment management (WG
chair: Sabine Apitz,
drsea@mudineye.plus.com)
|
|
• |
Harmonization of methods for assessing contaminated
sediments (WG-chair: Chris Ingersoll,
cingersoll@usgs.gov)
|
|
• |
PAH (WG chair: Judy Crane,
judy.crane@state.mn.us)
|
|
• |
Reviewing sediment targets used for water policy (WG
chair: Adrian Collins,
adrian.collins@adas.co.uk)
|
|
• |
Sediment quality in tropical countries (WG-chair:
Gerardo Gold-Bouchot,
ggold@mda.cinvestav.mx)
|
|
• |
Understanding and preparing for the response of
sediment-contaminant systems to natural and
anthropogenic disturbances and climate change (WG chair:
Philip Owens, owensp@unbc.ca) |
Feel free to contact the WG-chair if you are interested
in joining a SEDAG working group.
More info on SEDAG at
www.setac.net.
top
Sediment risk governance
Sediment is one of the 6 risk fields that are under
investigation in a project on “risk governance”
commissioned by the European Commission under its 6th
RTD Framework Programme. This project is entitled “RiskBridge”:
Building Robust, Integrative inter-Disciplinary
Governance models for Emerging and Existing risks (www.riskbridge.eu).
The members of the RISKBRIDGE sediment risk field group
are: Ramon Batalla; Henk Senhorst; Matjas Mikos; Rick
Wenning; Adriaan Slob; Jaap van der Vlies and Jos Brils.
They agreed to write down and synthesize some practical
experiences with sediment risk governance approaches in
several countries in Europe as well as in the United
States. The series of papers is now written and will be
submitted early 2009 to the peer-reviewed SETAC journal
"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM)".
Contact: Jos Brils (jos.brils@tno.nl), RiskBridge sediment risk field
coordinator.
top
Testing ecological toxicity in rivers
Source: DG Environment News Alert Service, issue 130
Water quality in rivers is commonly classified according
to its physical and chemical properties, but this may
not fully describe its biological health. Polish
researchers have tested a new method of water assessment,
which looks at the toxicity to organisms of not just
water, but also sediment and floodplain soil samples.
This provides a more complete picture of a river's
health and may help river managers meet the requirements
of the EU Water Framework Directive (see:
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html)
Pollutants are carried in both river water and the tiny
sediments which they transport. Pollutants can
accumulate in the sediments deposited on the river bed
and consequently in mud which can occasionally get
washed onto the surrounding floodplains. Sediment and
mud can therefore represent biological hazards and
should be treated as part of the river system.
Poland's mandatory testing of surface-water's physical
and chemical properties treats each component, such as
ammonia content, in isolation. This ignores possible
effects that arise when other pollutants combine or
react with each other, so does not measure the
cumulative ecological stress on the river.
The researchers used 'microbiotests' to assess the
effect of river samples on microscopic biological
organisms. Previous research used the same tests on a
variety of water samples (e.g. from rivers, groundwater
and mine run-off), but they were used here for the first
time on a complete river system, including sediment and
soil samples.
Samples were taken from 4 rivers in central Poland and
the tests included 8 species covering primary producers
(including algae and plants such as duckweed), consumers
(including crustaceans such as shrimps) and decomposers
(protozoa and bacteria). Pollutants may kill or damage
the species (e.g. restrict their growth). The toxicity
results are expressed as a percentage. For example, a
toxicity of 25 per cent means that there were toxic
effects in 1 out of every 4 tests. This allowed water
quality to be ranked in five classes according to levels
of toxicity.
The standard mandatory testing regime had classified the
rivers in generally unsatisfactory or poor condition (Class
IV / Class V). However, the microbiotests suggest higher
water quality, in the range of Class I-III. Sediment and
soil samples were less variable and of higher toxicity
than the water samples (mostly Classes II-III)
reflecting the build-up of pollutants in the sediments.
Tests found 4-19 per cent toxicity in water samples, and
this level of toxicity had the greatest effect on
primary producers. 6-27 per cent toxicity was found in
the sediment and soils, which had the greatest effect on
protozoan decomposers.
The researchers propose testing river systems in this
way alongside the standard tests, to provide a more
complete picture of a river's health and to assess
trends in changing water quality.
Source: Mankiewicz-Boczek, J., Nalecz-Jawecki, G.,
Drobniewska, A. et al. (2008). Application of a
microbiotests battery for complete toxicity assessment
of rivers. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety.
71(3): 830-836.
Contact:
j.mankiewicz@erce.unesco.lodz.pl
top
Iron as a new water "pollutant" in Central Germany
(From the German Working group on "Sediments and Water
Quality")
The River Pleisse, the major tributary of the River
Weisse Elster in the Central-German industrial region,
used to be excessively polluted mainly by industrial
wastewater from coal-processing, textile, and leather
industries before the political change in 1989. Since
then, anthropogenic pollution has significantly
decreased due to close-down of industrial plants and
upgrading of wastewater treatment plants. Nevertheless,
the water in the lower course of the river has remained
turbid and brown. This causes concern in the city of
Leipzig, where efforts are made to reconvert the river
branches and mill races that had been canalized
underground into open rivers and canals.
The cause of this phenomenon is groundwater pumping in
the large brown-coal open-cast mining district south of
the city. Quantity, quality, and locations of these
mine-drainage discharges are changing along with the
operation and advance of the mines. Groundwater that is
drained from tertiary horizons, where marcasite and
pyrite are present, contains up to 80 mg/l of soluble
iron. In the river, the iron is rapidly oxidized, bound
to particles of suspended matter, and transported
downstream. Previously, when the organic pollution was
high, the mine-drainage water with its high level of
dissolved iron even had a purifying effect. The iron
then flocculated the suspended particulate matter and
precipitated it into sediment with a high content of
sapropel.
Sediments sampled between 1991 and 2008 upstream of the
mining area had iron contents between 4 and 5%. In the
lower course of the river, the iron levels ranged
between 24% in 1991, 8% in 1994, 20% in 2004, and 17% in
2008. The geogenic iron background level in floodplain
soils on the lower River Pleisse is 4.3 % (Müller et al.
2003). Since iron is a common geogenic element it has
accumulated with the mine drainage in the lower course
of the River Pleisse for long. Suspended particulate
matter, sampled between 2000 and 2008 in the lower
course of the river at Leipzig, contains 6 to 26 mg/kg
iron. This corresponds to 2 to 69 mg/l total iron. The
wide variability is due to the fact that the sampling
campaigns were made during different hydrological events
(flood, drought).
Most of the iron in the river is particle-bound. That is
why the total iron content of the river water is
influenced by the amount of suspended solids in the
water and by the concentration of iron on these
particles. It depends on direct inputs as well as on the
hydrological situation. Heavy rain erodes soils, and
flood events mobilise old sediments (secondary sources),
so that concentration peaks may occur.
The mean daily iron load is 1.2 t/d, during mean
streamflow of 3.36 m³/s (gauged upstream of the
mine-drainage input) and with a total iron concentration
of 1 mg/l. Since January 2007, the mine-drainage inputs
have been limited to 0.3 m³/s. This corresponds to an
iron load of 0.8 t/d, calculated with a mean
concentration of 30 mg/l. So, the total iron
concentration in the river increases up to 3 mg/l
downstream of the mine-drainage input.
It is a paradox that the decrease in pollution in the
River Pleisse (heavy metals and organics) has also a
negative side-effect. The fine iron-oxide particles
remain longer in suspension, so that the riverbed on the
whole lower course becomes covered with a brownish
encrustation.
As a consequence, the mine operators are planning to
build a mine-drainage treatment plant.
Contact: Dr. Lutz Zerling, Christiane Hanisch; Saxonian
Academy of Sciences, Leipzig – Germany.
(zerling@saw-leipzig.de;
hanisch@saw-leipzig.de).
top
Sediment response to catchment disturbances
Session HS11.3 of the General Assembly of the European
Geosciences Union, 19-24 April 2009, Vienna, Austria
Conveners: Ellen Petticrew, Phil Owens and Marcel van
der Perk
Invited presentations
| •
|
Olav Slaymaker (University of British Columbia, Canada):
The relative importance of relief, hydroclimate and
human activity as drivers of environmental change in
mountain regions |
| •
|
Stan Trimble (UCLA, USA): Erosional effects of an
extreme rainstorm on Coon Creek, Wisconsin, USA, August
2007 |
| •
|
Gert Verstraeten (K. U. Leuven, Belgium): Human impact
on late-Holocene sediment transfers: typology,
controlling factors and scaling issues |
Session details
One of the greatest concerns facing earth and
environmental scientists is how landscapes respond to
present and future potential disturbances. This session
will focus on how sediment (fine and coarse) systems
react to natural and human-induced landscape
disturbances over a range of space and time scales. This
session solicits contributions that further our
understanding of the impact of disturbances, such as
changes in climate, land use (agriculture, forestry,
mining, and urbanization), wildfires, and anthropogenic
alterations in river channel morphology, on sediment
transport and sediment quality. Contributions related to
sediment and sediment-associated nutrient and
contaminant transfers ranging spatially from hillslope
scales to continental erosion and temporally from
short-term event processes to longer term historical
records are welcome.
Further details and abstract submission (deadline
January 13th 2009):
http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2009/session/601
top
Global change has dramatic impact on sediment dynamics
Global change has a dramatic impact on sediment dynamics
in the world’s main river basins, also in Europe! This
was the main message from an overwhelming presentation
given by Prof. Des Walling at the UNESCO International
Sediment Initiative (ISI) Steering Committee meeting in
Beijing at 6 November 2008. ISI (see:
www.irtces.org/isi/)
is an initiative under the UNESCO’s International
Hydrological Program (IHP). Prof. Walling’s presentation
made a considerable impact at the ISI meeting because it
is probably the first time that facts are brought
together to this dimension and in such a convincing way.
The ISI Steering Committee anticipates that the messages
from this presentation may impact policy makers.
Especially if there will also be an answer to the ‘So
what?’ question. Some first suggestions for that answer
were also briefly discussed, such as that the dramatic
reduction in sediment loads will lead to: reduced
biodiversity, reduced land fertility, wetland
degradation, retreating coast lines etc. Several case
examples can already be given of such impacts. Prof.
Walling will further elaborate his paper and then it
will be published through IHP channels. After that,
UNESCO will communicate the main messages of this paper
to the international press.
Contact: Jos Brils (jos.brils@tno.nl), SedNet delegate in the ISI
Steering Committee
top
Summary SeKT- symposium “Sediment contact tests – Reference conditions, control sediments, toxicity
thresholds”
13-14 November 2008, Koblenz, Germany
An international symposium on sediment contact tests was
held at the Federal Institute of Hydrology (BfG) to
round off the SeKT joint research project, which has
been funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education
and Research (BMBF) during the last three years. The
symposium focused on the outcome of the SeKT Project
regarding the applicability of a sediment contact test
battery as tool for the assessment of sediment quality
in relation to four general topics: ecotoxicological
science, method standardisation, water management and
environmental monitoring.
The results of the SeKT Project were presented by the
coordinator (Ute Feiler, BfG), covering all major
topics, such as (1) the definition of reference
conditions and control sediments, (2) the variability of
the test results influenced by natural sediment
properties, (3) the definition of realistic toxicity
thresholds, (4) the applicability of the sediment
contact tests at various types of sediments, and (5) the
development of a toxicity classification system for
sediments by using a reasonable combination of sediment
contact tests within a test battery that contributes to
an ecotoxicological assessment concept. Additionally, a
number of international speakers, stakeholders and
scientists, were invited to highlight aspects of the
relevance of sediment contact tests in the context of
environmental risk assessment and the EU WFD.
Block 1: Sediment Contact Tests and Science (Chair:
Sebastian Höss, Henner Hollert)
Keynote: Jussi Kukkonen (University of Jonsue, Finland):
Evaluation of Bioavailability and Toxicity of Chemicals
in Sediments.
Jaap Postma (Ecofide, The Netherlands): Developments in
the Dutch triad approach to improve the knowledge on
sediment toxicity.
Sebastian Höss (Institute of Biodiversity - Network,
Germany): Sediment Contact Tests as part of a holistic
approach: Part Nematodes.
Henner Hollert (RWTH Aachen University, Germany):
Sediment Contact Tests as part of a holistic approach:
Part Fish.
Block 2: Sediment Contact Tests and Standardization (Chair:
Ute Feiler, Georg Reifferscheid)
Keynote: Hans-Jürgen Pluta (Federal Environmental Agency,
Germany): Benefit from standardization, regulatory and
scientific requirements, procedures and participations.
Thomas Knacker (ECT Oekotoxikologie GmbH, Germany):
Standardization according to OECD rules:
Sediment toxicity test with Lumbriculus variegates.
Juha Lappalainen (Aboatox, Finland) Standardization
according to ISO rules: Flash test.
Block 3: Sediment Contact Tests and Management (Chair
Werner Manz)
Keynote: Ulrich Förstner (Technical University of
Hamburg-Harburg, Germany) SeKT and river basin
management: Focus on in-situ sediment remediation.
Axel Netzband (Hamburg Port Authority, Germany):
Sediment assessment from a user's perspective. Martin
Keller (BfG, Germany/IKSR): The ICPR sediment management
plan for contaminated sediments.
Block 4: Sediment Contact Tests and Monitoring (Chair
Henner Hollert, Sebastian Höss)
Keynote: Mario Carere (National Institute of Health,
Italy): Chemical monitoring activity in the context of
the Water Framework Directive.
Eric de Deckere (University of Antwerpen, Belgium):
Integrated sediment assessment in Flanders; From
surveillance to investigative monitoring.
Maria J. Belzunce Segarra (AZTI-Tecnalia, Spain): A
proposal for including an integrated sediments
evaluation in the European Framework Directive.
Mathias Ricking (FU Berlin, Germany): Implementation of
sediments/SPM in the WFD 2009.
Piet den Besten (Rijkswaterstaat, The Netherlands):
Sediment quality assessment in The Netherlands: linking
science to policy.
Christophe Mouvet (BRGM, France): Hazards linked to
dredged sediments – a French perspective.
Major topics of the discussion were:
|
• |
Robust, representative and reliable bio-test systems are
needed for better assessment of sediments and dredged
materials as pointed out by the stakeholders (after
Block 1-3). Standardisation of the sediment contact
tests is desirable. The definition of reference
conditions as in the SeKT Project is a valuable
contribution to an improvement in the interpretation and
reliability of sediment contact tests. A test battery,
as presented in the SeKT Project, can help in balancing
costs and benefits of sediment management. |
|
• |
Contributions from several European countries were
presented, reflecting the different ways of river
monitoring in Europe. Different approaches for
investigative monitoring studies of polluted sediments
within the WFD (e.g. TRIAD, WOE, TIE, ms-PAF) were
proposed and controversially discussed. Besides the
derivation of environmental quality standards for
chemical monitoring in waters, the elaboration of a
methodology for the setting of EQSs for sediment and
biota was pointed out. |
|
• |
The need of sediment quality guidelines for ERA,
ecosystem-based approaches for management of sediments (i.e.
dredged material) and remediation technologies were in
the focus of many contributions. |
The proceedings of the symposium will be published (in
English) in a BfG-publication series "Veranstaltungen".
For more information, please contact Ute Feiler
(feiler@bafg.de;
http://sekt.bafg.de).
top
“Sustainability in Dredging” was the focus at CEDA
Dredging Days
The role of dredging and maritime construction in
sustainable development was the focus of this year’s
CEDA Dredging Days which took place in Antwerp, Belgium,
1-3 October 2008. Under the theme ‘Dredging facing
sustainability’, presentations in six technical sessions
addressed the key issues facing the industry, including
climate change. On the subject of climate change, it was
clear from the presentations that dredging and maritime
construction have important and complex roles to play.
On the one hand the profession can contribute to the
fight by reducing CO2 emissions through the development,
and use, of innovative dredging equipment and technology.
It also has an important role in enabling the shift to
renewable energy sources for instance through the
construction of wind farms. On the other hand the
industry will play a crucial role in our adaptation to
the effects of climate change by for example protecting
human life and valuable resources from flooding. The
role of dredging in restoring wetlands and in
revitalising our estuaries was also extensively
discussed.
In his opening speech Freddy Aerts, Conference Chair (Flemish
Government), referred to the ProSes Scheldt Estuary 2010
development project and reminded delegates that “...it
is possible to safeguard navigation possibilities in an
economic manner and at the same time take the area’s
ecology into account”. Conference highlights included
the two keynote speeches ‘Can dredging improve ecosystem
services to achieve sustainability?’ by Prof. Patrick
Meire and ‘The dredging industry and the European port
system – challenges and opportunities’ by Prof. Theo
Notteboom, both from the University of Antwerp.
The presentations will be made available to the public
from 1 February 2009 on the conference’s website (www.cedaconferences.org/dredgingdays2008).
CEDA is already preparing for its next Dredging Days for
which the call for papers was issued in Antwerp. With
the theme ‘Dredging tools for the future’, CEDA Dredging
Days 2009 will further elaborate on the subject of
dredging and sustainability with a special focus on
dredging equipment and technology (5 - 6 November 2009,
the Conference Centre, Ahoy Rotterdam, the Netherlands).
For more information visit
www.cedaconferences.org or
www.dredging.org.
top
CEDA-MSI seminar “Dredging and the Environment” in
Tallinn, Estonia, on 15-16 October 2008
The Environment Commission of the Central Dredging
Association (CEC) and the Marine Systems Institute of
Tallinn University of Technology (MSI) jointly organised
an international conference entitled “Dredging and the
Environment”. As with many other parts of the world the
fast-growing economies of the Baltic countries generate
a high demand on dredging services, be it the expansion
of ports, offshore sand mining, the construction of
offshore wind farms, or cleaning up the environment.
In his opening address Professor Jüri Elken, Director of
MSI, said that the conference bridged the gap between
marine science and engineering, and highlighted the
importance of a more holistic approach to maritime
construction works. The 12 presentations were given by
speakers representing academia, ports, dredging
contractors, consultants, and the owners of large
infrastructure projects. The Presentations given at the
seminar will be made available to the public from 15
February 2009 (www.cedaconferences.org/tallinn2008).
About MSI:
Marine Systems Institute at Tallinn University of
Technology (MSI) is a science and development
organization researching the physical (mainly
hydrodynamic) and biogeochemical processes of the Baltic
Sea in the context of atmospheric, terrestrial and
anthropogenic interactions. Their main focus is on water
and material exchange in the Baltic Sea, changes in the
structure and state of the pelagic ecosystem, coastal
sea dynamics, and optics in the context of climate
change. Based on the main research topics the institute
is conducting scientific research and applied sea
studies. Operational monitoring and prognosis of sea
level, oil pollution propagation and blue-green algae
blooms are performed. Different projects include the
environmental impacts of land-based pollution and
dredging, ice conditions, and remote sensing. The
institute provides master and doctorate programs in
oceanography. See:
www.msi.ttu.ee.
top
New publication
The U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center
announces the publication of a new document on its website:
http://el.erdc.usace.army.mil/
ERDC/EL TR-08-29
Technical Guidelines for Environmental Dredging of
Contaminated Sediments by Michael R. Palermo, Paul R.
Schroeder, Trudy J. Estes, and Norman R. Francingues
This report provides technical guidelines for evaluating
environmental dredging as a sediment remedy component.
The document supports the Contaminated Sediment
Remediation Guidance for Hazardous Waste Sites, released
by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) in
2005, by providing detailed information regarding
evaluation of environmental dredging as a remedy
component.
The document is intended to be applicable to
contaminated sediment sites evaluated under various
environmental laws and regulatory programs. The intended
audience for this report includes all stakeholders
potentially involved in evaluating environmental
dredging for purposes of a feasibility study, remedial
design, and implementation.
The scope of this document is limited to the technical
aspects of the environmental dredging process itself,
but it is important that environmental dredging be
integrated with other components such as transport,
dewatering, treatment, and rehandling and disposal
options. The report covers initial evaluation, pertinent
site conditions and sediment characteristics,
environmental dredging performance standards, equipment
capabilities and selection, evaluation of production,
duration, and transport, methods for estimating
resuspension, residuals and release, control measures,
operating methods and strategies, and monitoring.
If you wish to access/download the document (302 pages,
6.1 mb) in pdf format, the address is:
http://libweb.wes.army.mil/uhtbin/hyperion/EL-TR-08-29.pdf
To access this file, you must be running Windows 95 or
higher, Netscape or Internet Explorer, and Adobe Acrobat
Reader 6.0 or higher. The free Adobe Acrobat Reader can
be downloaded at
http://www.adobe.com/products/acrobat/readstep2.html
Please note: Documents open in popup window. Popup
blockers must be set to "temporarily allow" for the
document to load properly.
top
To be published soon…
In January 2009 a new book will become available,
entitled “Contaminated Sediments” in the series “The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry”, Vol. 5:
Water Pollution, Part 5T.
Kassim, Tarek A.; Barceló, Damia (Eds.) - ISBN:
978-3-540-88013-4
When discussing the issue of contamination of the
aquatic environment, water pollution is still the major
aspect that has been regulated and extensively studied,
but poor attention has been devoted to sediments.
Sediments have been described as the sink or storage
place and a source for contaminants entering river
systems through various pathways. But bottom sediments
have various functions in the environment, such as
providing habitat for many aquatic organisms, and are an
important component of aquatic ecosystems.
This volume of the Handbook deals with various aspects
of sediment contamination such as the fate and behavior
of persistent organic pollutants, the application of
sediment toxicity identification evaluation (TIE)
protocols, and the various ways to degrade toxic
pollutants from sediments. Overall the book provides
readers the fundamental knowledge needed to better
understand the complex issue of contaminated sediments.
http://www.springer.com/environment/air/book/978-3-540-88013-4
top
Calls for Abstracts/Papers
The Call for Papers for the
CEDA Dredging Days 2009 is now available online. The conference and exhibition will
take place on 5th - 6th of November 2009 in Rotterdam,
the Netherlands. On 4th of November there will be an
optional technical visit to one of the shipyards of
IHC
Merwede. With the theme “Dredging Tools for the Future”.
CEDA Dredging Days 2009” will explore how the dredging
community responds to the new challenges of current
times such as climate change, rising energy costs, the
increasing demand for dredging services by the offshore
and win farms industries and so on. The conference will
be complemented by a technical exhibition that will take
place in the foyer of the conference room.
Deadline for submission of abstracts is 15 January 2009.
http://www.cedaconferences.org/dredgingdays2009
Session HS11.3 of the General Assembly of the European
Geosciences Union, 19-24 April 2009, Vienna, Austria:
Sediment response to catchment disturbances
One of the greatest concerns facing earth and
environmental scientists is how landscapes respond to
present and future potential disturbances. This session
will focus on how sediment (fine and coarse) systems
react to natural and human-induced landscape
disturbances over a range of space and time scales. This
session solicits contributions that further our
understanding of the impact of disturbances, such as
changes in climate, land use (agriculture, forestry,
mining, and urbanization), wildfires, and anthropogenic
alterations in river channel morphology, on sediment
transport and sediment quality. Contributions related to
sediment and sediment-associated nutrient and
contaminant transfers ranging spatially from hillslope
scales to continental erosion and temporally from
short-term event processes to longer term historical
records are welcome.
Further details and abstract submission (deadline
January 13th 2009):
http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2009/session/601
top
Upcoming events
2008:
1-5 December 2008: International Symposium on Sediment
Dynamics in Changing Environments, Christchurch, New
Zealand. Organised by the International Commission on
Continental Erosion.
http://www.civil.canterbury.ac.nz/icce2008/index.shtml
2009:
29–30 January 2009: Seminar “Environmental Aspects of
Dredging”. Organised by PAO, Post Graduate Education, of
the Delft University of Technology in co-operation with
IADC and CEDA. Venue: Delft, The Netherlands.
http://www.dredging.org/documents/ceda/downloads/events-ead2009-pao.pdf
2-5 February 2009: Fifth International Conference on
Remediation of Contaminated Sediment, Jacksonville,
Florida, USA. Abstracts are due on 30 June 2008
http://www.battelle.org/conferences/sediments
19-24 April 2009: General Assembly of the European
Geosciences Union, Vienna, Austria.
Session HS11.3: Sediment response to catchment
disturbances
Further details and abstract submission (deadline
January 13th 2009):
http://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2009/session/601
20-23 April 2009: HydroEco 2009 – 2nd International
Multidisciplinary Conference on Hydrology and Ecology –
Ecosystems Interfacing with Groundwater and Surface
Water, Vienna, Austria. Themes: interface
surface-sediments-groundwater, wetlands, floodplanning
and the role of sediments in this process. IAHS/IAHR are
involved in the organisation. Focus on science, less on
management.
http://www.natur.cuni.cz/hydroeco2009/
11-13 May 2009: BOSICON 2009 – the 2nd International
Conference on Polluted Sites Remediation, Rome, Italy.
Organised by the Sapienza University Rome. More info at
http://w3.uniroma1.it/BOSICON_2009/index.htm
27-30 May 2009: Global Change – Challenges for Soil
Management. Venue: Tara Mountain, Serbia.
Organized by the World Association of Soil and Water
Conservation, Belgrade University, World Association for
Sedimentation and Erosion Research, European Society of
Soil Conservation.
For more info please contact
miodrag.zla@sbb.rs or
mizlatic@yahoo.com
30 June – 3 July 2009: Fourth International Symposium on
Contaminated Sediments: Sustainable Management and
Remediation. Ireland.
http://www.irtces.org/isi/
14-16 September 2009: 3rd International Conference on
Estuaries and Coasts, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
http://donko.civil.tohoku.ac.jp/icec2009/index.html
6-8 October 2009: SedNet event “Sediment Management in
River Basin Management Plans” (Round Table Discussion)
and “The Role of Sediments in Coastal Management”
(Conference), Hamburg, Germany. More info soon available
at www.sednet.org
5-6 November 2009: CEDA Dredging Days 2009, Rotterdam,
the Netherlands. Call for Papers open until 15 January
2009.
http://www.cedaconferences.org/dredgingdays2009
2010:
15-17 March 2010: Integrated River Basin Management
Conference; action programs and monitoring under the
Water Framework Directive. Lille, France.
http://www.WFDLille2010.org
9–14 September 2010: A conference of the World
Organisation of Dredging Associations, WODCON XIX,
Beijing, China. Organised by EADA in association of its
Chinese Chapter, CHIDA.
A Call for Papers will be issued early 2009.
http://www.woda.org
2011:
19-23 June 2011: 12th International Symposium on the
Interactions between Sediments and Water, Dartington,
Devon, England. Organised by the International
Association for Sediment Water Science (IASWS)
http://www.iasws.org and
www.geog.plymouth.ac.uk/iasws2011
top
SedNet secretariat:
Mrs. Marjan Euser
Deltares / TNO
P.O. Box 342
NL-7300 AH Apeldoorn
The Netherlands
E-mail
marjan.euser@tno.nl
back
|